| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
| Date: | 2000-12-28 08:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4671.977991011@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> Smart Shutdown request at Thu Dec 28 02:41:49 2000
>> DEBUG: shutting down
>> FATAL 2: Checkpoint lock is busy while data base is shutting down
>> Shutdown failed - abort
> It's not just on Alpha; I've seen that on my i386 Linux system.
Oooh, that's interesting. I was just blindly assuming that it was
a problem with the Alpha spinlock code (we've sure heard plenty of
discussion of same). But maybe there's an actual logic bug in the
checkpoint code. I don't see one in a quick scan though.
FWIW, I do *not* see this behavior on HPUX. It seems perfectly
reproducible on the Debian Alpha box. Is it reproducible on your
i386 box, or only sometimes?
Vadim, any ideas?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-12-28 08:24:56 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-12-28 07:59:06 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |