Re: pointer to feature comparisons, please

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pointer to feature comparisons, please
Date: 2007-06-13 22:29:40
Message-ID: 46706FD4.5090401@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 06/13/07 17:23, PFC wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:09:20 +0200, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/13/07 16:59, PFC wrote:
>>>> Isn't it *supposed* to mis UNcommitted changes from other transactions?
>>> Well, if the "uncommited change" is a DELETE of the row that
>>> allowed the constraint check to pass, then when this delete is
>>> commited, your data is no longer consistent.
>>
>> The DELETE should block, no?
>
> Why ?
>
> Foreign keys put an ON DELETE trigger on the referenced table

Foreign keys that silently, automatic DELETE records?

Did I read that correctly?

> besides checking the referencing column on insert/update... If you just
> implement a constraint, you only get half the functionality.

But when I define a FK *constraint*, that's all I *want*!

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alejandro Torras 2007-06-13 22:39:42 Re: Using the GPU
Previous Message PFC 2007-06-13 22:28:39 Re: inner join problem with temporary tables