Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date: 2007-06-13 12:35:17
Message-ID: 466FE485.3050002@pooteeweet.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Dave Page (dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
>> /* We only show the rel name, not schema name */
>> relname = get_rel_name(rte->relid);
>>
>> Anyone know why? This seems like a bug to me given the ambiguity of
>> possible output.
>
> I'd assume it's to keep the explain output smaller with the
> expectation/assumption that in general you're going to know. A possible
> work-around would be to just always provide table aliases for your
> queries, as those are shown in the explain.

I am hoping that once we have WITH RECURSIVE, we could optionally
provide a normalized dump into a table of the EXPLAIN output, that could
then be easily "connected" the the old output using WITH RECURSIVE.

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-06-13 12:38:40 Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-06-13 12:20:25 Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?