From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |
Date: | 2007-06-13 12:35:17 |
Message-ID: | 466FE485.3050002@pooteeweet.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Dave Page (dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
>> /* We only show the rel name, not schema name */
>> relname = get_rel_name(rte->relid);
>>
>> Anyone know why? This seems like a bug to me given the ambiguity of
>> possible output.
>
> I'd assume it's to keep the explain output smaller with the
> expectation/assumption that in general you're going to know. A possible
> work-around would be to just always provide table aliases for your
> queries, as those are shown in the explain.
I am hoping that once we have WITH RECURSIVE, we could optionally
provide a normalized dump into a table of the EXPLAIN output, that could
then be easily "connected" the the old output using WITH RECURSIVE.
regards,
Lukas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-06-13 12:38:40 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-06-13 12:20:25 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |