Re: Database performance problem

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: "Porell, Chris" <Chris(dot)Porell(at)ceridian(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database performance problem
Date: 2007-06-12 20:35:25
Message-ID: 466F038D.1020707@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Porell, Chris wrote:
> Hi All,

> I've changed shared_buffers, checkpoint_segments, effective_cache_size and
> random_page_cost in an attempt to improve performance. That has helped a
> little...

Another thought. Have you looked at "work_mem" - this is probably a far
more important setting.

The units are kilobytes and you can set this on a session-by-session
basis to test without needing to update postgresql.conf or reload the
server by issuing "set work_mem to xxx;" I have individual nightly
batch-runs where I greatly improved the processing time by setting
work_mem to values in the range of 100000-500000 as needed.

Note that if you are comparing your old configuration to your new one,
this parameter used to be called "sort_mem".

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-06-12 20:41:58 Re: Database performance problem
Previous Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-06-12 20:35:06 Re: Foreign Key error