Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Larry McGhaw <lmcghaw(at)connx(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Date: 2007-06-11 23:34:37
Message-ID: 466DDC0D.7020503@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dann Corbit wrote:
> However, I won't twist your arm. I just wanted to be sure that those at
> the PostgreSQL organization were aware of this simple trick. Our
> products run on:
> Aix
> BeOS
> Hpux
> Linux (everywhere, including mainframe zLinux)
> MVS
> SunOS
> Solaris
> OpenVMS Alpha
> OpenVMS VAX
> OpenVMS Itanium
> Windows
>
> And several others
>
>
>
>

We already set the SNDBUF on Windows for reasons documented in the code.

I think if you were to quantify the alleged improvement by platform it
might allay suspicion.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2007-06-11 23:47:48 Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2007-06-11 23:18:32 Re: Got no response last time on setsockopt post, so I thought I would reiterate.