Re: about help message for new pg_dump's --filter option

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: about help message for new pg_dump's --filter option
Date: 2023-11-30 13:06:40
Message-ID: 4669E1CE-1230-49D3-8B98-C16191D74B37@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 30 Nov 2023, at 02:52, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:20:40 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>> Hello.
>>
>> Recently, a new --filter option was added to pg_dump. I might be
>> wrong, but the syntax of the help message for this feels off. Is the
>> word 'on' not necessary after 'based'?
>>
>>> --filter=FILENAME include or exclude objects and data from dump
>>> based expressions in FILENAME
>
> Hmm. A similar message is spelled as "based on expression". Thus, the
> attached correct this message in this line.

Right, that's an unfortunate miss, it should've been "based on expression" like
you propose. Fixed.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-11-30 13:07:21 Re: Extra periods in pg_dump messages
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-11-30 13:05:47 Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file