Re: [PATCH] Re: pg_identify_object_as_address() doesn't support pg_event_trigger oids

From: "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
To: "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: pg_identify_object_as_address() doesn't support pg_event_trigger oids
Date: 2021-04-27 12:33:36
Message-ID: 466796f7-be5c-4326-b102-b575f26ce019@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, at 09:48, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:16:25AM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> > I've added a test at the end of event_trigger.sql,
> > reusing the three event triggers already in existence,
> > just before they are dropped.
>
> Cool, thanks. I have been looking at it and I'd still like to
> cross-check the output data of pg_get_object_address() to see if
> pg_identify_object() remains consistent through it. See for example
> the attached that uses a trick based on LATERAL, a bit different than
> what's done in object_address.sql but that gives the same amount of
> coverage (I could also use two ROW()s and an equality, but well..).

Neat trick, looks good to me.

I've successfully tested fix_event_trigger_pg_identify_object_as_address3.patch.

/Joel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com 2021-04-27 12:37:00 RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN()
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2021-04-27 12:31:08 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.