| From: | Rui DeSousa <rui(at)crazybean(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The trap when using pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2021-07-04 21:32:46 |
| Message-ID: | 46651FE6-5D07-44CF-B7D2-3D807EED198F@crazybean.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> On Jul 4, 2021, at 2:04 AM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Well, I never store the
Well, as long as we’re stating I never’s — let me state mine; I never consider a logical backup (pg_dump) a proper backup. They have their use cases and are a very useful tool; however, I would considered a production database without a physical backup as not being backed up. Logical backups don’t allow for PITR recovery and are very slow in comparison. I only use logical backups for migrations, etc. - more as a tool rather than a backup strategy.
A good practice would be to have a separate instance that can instantiate a point in time recovery. This would allow for the reviewing/exporting required data needed to resolve a given issue.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Avadhut Narayan Joshi | 2021-07-05 10:11:09 | RE: Substitute for table variable and data migration approach |
| Previous Message | pgdba pgdba | 2021-07-04 19:36:44 | Archive cleanup |