| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Davidson, Robert" <robdavid(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nightly builds |
| Date: | 2006-03-24 15:12:27 |
| Message-ID: | 4662.1143213147@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Davidson, Robert wrote:
>> If there were a place to download patches, this would allow moderately adventurous Windows users to roll their own and avoid the overhead of nightly Windows builds.
> ... you shouldn't need to apply patches directly, unless you are
> testing to assist the patch author.
In any case, patches that are done but not yet applied would be
available from the pgsql-patches archives. Assuming you've got a copy
of "patch" or equivalent, you could cherry-pick unapplied stuff from
there.
This is all old hat to longtime Unix users, but I think it's a vanishing
skill among newer ones because of the prevalence of package-based
distributions. And of course Windows and Mac users are completely
unaccustomed to the idea of rolling their own builds. Documentation
wouldn't be a bad idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | August Zajonc | 2006-03-24 16:54:54 | Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-24 15:01:34 | Re: Nightly builds |