Re: Transactional DDL

On 06/02/07 13:35, Jasbinder Singh Bali wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
>>
>> > Whats so novel about postgresql here?
>> > This would happen in any RDBMS. right?
>> > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole
>> > transaction and it did not create the table bar?
>>
>> [Please don't top-post. It makes the discussion hard to follow.]
>>
>> I used the divide by zero to raise an error to show that both the
>> CREATE TABLE and the INSERT were rolled back when the transaction
>> failed. If there's another definition of transactional DDL, I'd like
>> to know what it is.
>>
>> Michael Glaesemann
>> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
> This is what happens in every RDBMS. Whats so special about postgres then?

But it's NOT what happens in every RDBMS. Oracle implicitly
executes a COMMIT after every DDL statement.

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!