Re: One last Slony question (was Re: Slightly OT.)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: One last Slony question (was Re: Slightly OT.)
Date: 2007-06-02 00:17:08
Message-ID: 4660B704.3000204@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/01/07 18:35, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> Since DDL is infrequent, is that bottleneck an acceptable trade-off?
>>
>> Define infrequent? I have customers that do it, everyday in prod. They
>> do it willingly and refuse to change that habit.
>
> Even 2 or 3 ALTER TABLE or CREATE INDEX or CREATE TABLE statements per
> day is a drop in the bucket compared to the number of I/U/D statements, no?

True.

J

>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Staubo 2007-06-02 00:27:06 Re: multimaster
Previous Message Alexander Staubo 2007-06-02 00:07:19 Re: High-availability