| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One last Slony question (was Re: Slightly OT.) |
| Date: | 2007-06-02 00:17:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4660B704.3000204@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/01/07 18:35, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> Since DDL is infrequent, is that bottleneck an acceptable trade-off?
>>
>> Define infrequent? I have customers that do it, everyday in prod. They
>> do it willingly and refuse to change that habit.
>
> Even 2 or 3 ALTER TABLE or CREATE INDEX or CREATE TABLE statements per
> day is a drop in the bucket compared to the number of I/U/D statements, no?
True.
J
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Staubo | 2007-06-02 00:27:06 | Re: multimaster |
| Previous Message | Alexander Staubo | 2007-06-02 00:07:19 | Re: High-availability |