| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Signing off of patches (was Re: Not ready for 8.3) |
| Date: | 2007-05-19 00:27:10 |
| Message-ID: | 464E445E.7090209@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Having the Linux process still in memory, I started thinking that maybe
> what we need, is a sign-off process, whereby developer A reviews other
> developers' patches, make comments, and when the commented-on developer
> (call him B) has fixed the issues that A had, then A signs off B patch.
> In return for the favor, B also reviews and signs off A patches.
> Eventually this leads to more cooperation between otherwise independent
> developers.
>
>
>
You're thinking of the wrong process. What you seem to be suggesting is
a process that mimics the Usenet Oracle[1], in which if you ask a
question you get given one to answer ...
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-19 01:45:07 | Re: Signing off of patches (was Re: Not ready for 8.3) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2007-05-19 00:05:50 | Re: COPY into a view; help w. design & patch |