From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch queue triage |
Date: | 2007-05-17 17:21:50 |
Message-ID: | 464C8F2E.7020103@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>
> I suppose inserting HOT tuples without index maintenance is useful
> even if no
> changes to the space allocation is made is useful. It won't get the
> space
> usage but it would save on index thrashing. But that still implies
> all the
> code to handle scans, updates, index builds, etc. Those chunks could be
> separated out but you can't commit without them.
>
>
>
> There are few things that we can separate easily, like CREATE INDEX
> related changes, VACUUM and VACUUM FULL related changed, space
> reuse related changes etc. Let me give it a shot.
Did we ever get a broken up patch for this?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>
>
> --
>
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-17 17:26:27 | Re: Patch queue triage |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-17 17:21:19 | Re: Group Commit |