Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Date: 2007-05-16 17:29:35
Message-ID: 464B3F7F.6080400@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In talking to people who are assigned to review patches or could review
> patches, I often get the reply, "Oh, yea, I need to do that".
>
> It seems there is a lot of reliance on Tom to get the patches applied,
> but I don't think that is fair or reasonable. I think we need more
> urgency on the part of everyone to make faster progress. Patch
> reviewers and committers need to take more initiative to get things done
> rather than wait for some external force to prompt them.

We have *alot* of people (comparatively) who can assist in reviewing
code that are not committers. Even if they can not commit, they can help
insure that patches are in a state that can be more easily reviewed for
committers to actually test and apply.

Joshua D. Drake

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Barosio 2007-05-16 17:30:32 Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-05-16 17:29:16 Re: Concurrent psql patch