From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | rob caSSon <rob(at)styro(dot)lib(dot)muohio(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] primary key view failure |
Date: | 1999-08-05 15:47:02 |
Message-ID: | 4647.933868022@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
rob caSSon <rob(at)styro(dot)lib(dot)muohio(dot)edu> writes:
> should have sent this along in the first place....
> using latest unstable debian package...6.5.1-4
OK, then it evidently is a bug or porting problem. Hard to say
what though; we need more evidence.
Is there any difference in the plans you get from "explain" of the
direct query and the view query? I get this either way:
Hash Join (cost=83.94 rows=19044 width=94)
-> Nested Loop (cost=53.62 rows=552 width=58)
-> Seq Scan on pg_index (cost=2.19 rows=1 width=20)
-> Seq Scan on pg_attribute (cost=51.43 rows=1104 width=38)
-> Hash (cost=6.55 rows=138 width=36)
-> Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=6.55 rows=138 width=36)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olivier Ertz | 1999-08-05 15:48:34 | Array of integer |
Previous Message | rob caSSon | 1999-08-05 15:24:25 | Re: [SQL] primary key view failure |