Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> That's not really the most preferable solution, I think, seeing that it
>>> still leaves the user with the problem of having to create the types in
>>> the right order to start with.
>>>
>
>
>> I'm not sure we can keep the _foo convention and avoid that.
>>
>
> Auto-rename. I'm working on a patch now, and it doesn't look like it'll
> be too awful. Will post it for comments when it's working.
>
Ok, cool. I look forward to it.
cheers
andrew