Re: In theory question

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: In theory question
Date: 2007-05-09 21:15:09
Message-ID: 464239DD.6040701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> This is exactly what I was asking about. So my theoretical idea has
>>> already been implemented. Now if only *all* my ideas were done for me by
>>> the time I came up with them :)
>> Then you wouldn't be able to eventually patent them ;)
>
> I think you are overly optimistic ;-)

You obviously haven't reviewed the US patent system. I just patented "A
textual method for conveying expression without using any standardized
language and only predetermined, but arbitrary symbols."

I noticed you used the ;-). You owe me 75.00.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Karsten

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhaval Shah 2007-05-09 21:31:17 WAL file internals and why a 64 bit will not work on a 32 bit
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2007-05-09 20:52:55 Re: In theory question