| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Date: | 2007-05-08 00:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | 463FBF0A.4020805@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>
>>
>
> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL project,
> but (probably) not vice versa.
Thanks.
I'm not an expert about licence at all. Though it's impossible
to release (L)GPL code as BSD one, it seems possible to release
BSD code as (L)GPL one. I feel strange a little that there's no
*give and take*.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-08 00:12:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-07 23:45:04 | Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-08 00:12:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-08 00:05:15 | Re: pg_type |