From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |
Date: | 2007-05-07 17:00:02 |
Message-ID: | 463F5B12.1020105@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> If we really want to make the logfile the approved method for
>> monitoring performance, then why do we have the stats infrastructure
>> at all? It could all be replaced with logging output and pgfouine.
>
> First we'd have to fix the usability problem of our redirect_stderr
> stuff for pgfouine (multiline messages from different backends are
> mixed, according to Guillaume).
I'd like to sign on to the list of people saying that logging isn't the
best way to do performance measuring. Providing a way to get at the
counters in realtime for monitoring or graphing or whatever is what
AFAIK everybody else do, and it's for a good reason - it fits in to
existing monitoring/management solutions. It may be that our current
stats system isn't the best way to do this, but if it isn't that just
means we have to come up with a better way.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-07 19:17:19 | Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-05-07 16:00:09 | Re: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-07 17:02:54 | Re: plperl vs. bytea |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2007-05-07 16:09:17 | Re: plperl vs. bytea |