From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL? |
Date: | 2007-05-04 18:38:37 |
Message-ID: | 463B7DAD.2020707@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Pavel,
>
>>> Hmm, I see your point. I'm personally satisfied with adding a new
>>> proargmode to solve this as you suggest.
>> This will break client-side code that looks at proargmode, and I don't
>> think the argument in favor is strong enough to justify that ...
>
> What kind of client-side code are we talking about breaking? Just pgAdmin &
> phpPgAdmin and the like, or potentially other stuff that calls stored
> procedures?
>
> FWIW, pgAdmin3 1.6 *already* breaks on 8.3 procedures, so we have client-side
> breakage already.
>
If we're going to make a change, please do so sooner rather than later.
I'd like to take pgAdmin to beta Real Soon Now if possible.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-05-04 18:44:07 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 18:29:27 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first |