Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?
Date: 2007-05-04 18:38:37
Message-ID: 463B7DAD.2020707@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Pavel,
>
>>> Hmm, I see your point. I'm personally satisfied with adding a new
>>> proargmode to solve this as you suggest.
>> This will break client-side code that looks at proargmode, and I don't
>> think the argument in favor is strong enough to justify that ...
>
> What kind of client-side code are we talking about breaking? Just pgAdmin &
> phpPgAdmin and the like, or potentially other stuff that calls stored
> procedures?
>
> FWIW, pgAdmin3 1.6 *already* breaks on 8.3 procedures, so we have client-side
> breakage already.
>

If we're going to make a change, please do so sooner rather than later.
I'd like to take pgAdmin to beta Real Soon Now if possible.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-05-04 18:44:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-04 18:29:27 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Teach tuplesort.c about "top N" sorting, in which only the first