From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
Date: | 2012-10-03 14:28:59 |
Message-ID: | 4639.1349274539@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe I am missing something here, but reindex concurrently should do
> 1) BEGIN
> 2) Lock table in share update exlusive
> 3) lock old index
> 3) create new index
> 4) obtain session locks on table, old index, new index
> 5) commit
> 6) process till newindex->insisready (no new locks)
> 7) process till newindex->indisvalid (no new locks)
> 8) process till !oldindex->indisvalid (no new locks)
> 9) process till !oldindex->indisready (no new locks)
> 10) drop all session locks
> 11) lock old index exlusively which should be "invisible" now
> 12) drop old index
You can't drop the session locks until you're done. Consider somebody
else trying to do a DROP TABLE between steps 10 and 11, for instance.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-03 14:38:57 | Re: [9.1] 2 bugs with extensions |
Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2012-10-03 13:11:03 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |