| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heap page diagnostic functions |
| Date: | 2007-05-01 12:26:00 |
| Message-ID: | 463731D8.70509@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Any suggestions? pgdiagnostics?
I'm happy with forensics myself.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sounds good, though I am worried that "forensics" will not be a word
> easily understood by non-native English speakers.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I'm taking over Simon's heap page diagnostic functions to get them into
>> shape for committing.
>>
>> I'm thinking of having a new contrib-module for them: pgforensics. All
>> the new functions go there, and I'm also going to move bt_page_items,
>> bt_page_stats, and bt_metap functions from pgstattuple to the new
>> module. They're all low-level functions that no application should be
>> calling, so there shouldn't be any compatibility issues in moving them.
>>
>> That'd leave only the functions that a DBA or tools should be concerned
>> with in pgstattuple, and all the low-level debugging aids to the new
>> module. Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Heikki Linnakangas
>> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-05-01 12:27:40 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | shieldy | 2007-05-01 12:18:16 | Re: [HACKERS] SOS, help me please, one problem towards the postgresql developement on windows |