Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date: 2006-06-14 22:31:17
Message-ID: 4636.1150324277@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What would make sense to work on
>> is making the build step that strips not-officially-exported symbols
>> work on more platforms.

> Uh, well, I had some patches in the patch queue to go in that direction,
> but I thought the conclusion in that thread was that it wasn't worth it.

We currently have coverage for Linux and Darwin. If we had coverage for
the *BSDen I would figure it was close enough ... is it possible to do
the *BSDen with a few more makefile lines, or is it too ugly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-14 22:31:42 Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-06-14 22:26:50 Re: CSV mode option for pg_dump