| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Preferred Installation/Data Directories |
| Date: | 2007-04-27 17:57:37 |
| Message-ID: | 46323991.3010207@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/07 09:50, Rich Shepard wrote:
[snip]
>
> I see in postgresql.SlackBuild where the data directories are specified.
> I'll change that from /var/lib/pgsql/data to /usr/local/pgsql/data and
> rebuild the package.
(Explicitly noting that this is a serious question, not an attempt
to start a flame war.)
Why put "active" data under /usr? Ever since user data was moved to
/home, /usr has only had system stuff in it. Or is that still a
viable BSDism?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGMjmRS9HxQb37XmcRAhAHAJ9Z0s8BOmQuaXTR6QsGXz+NISQvqACeN9g1
Hww/Z37CCfiqhDsHxuvpzaA=
=0nk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-04-27 17:59:49 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
| Previous Message | John Cole | 2007-04-27 17:48:48 | Query in function not using index... |