From: | Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | CAJ CAJ <pguser(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL upgrade server A -> server B |
Date: | 2007-04-27 07:33:20 |
Message-ID: | 4631A740.60601@theendofthetunnel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 27.04.2007 03:09, CAJ CAJ wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been discussed before (or if it sounds absurd)
>
> Upgrading large postgres databases (100GB+) takes awfully long time when
> doing dump/restore. I was wondering if this process can be optimized by
> directly dumping to a new version of Pg database directly on another server
> without having to dump to the filesystem and then restore it.
>
> pg_dump on new server might look something like,
> pg_dump <options> -h <old server> -h <new_server> dbname
>
> or can it be used as-is by piping it?
>
> pg_dump <options> -h <old server> dbname | pg_restore
Maybe consider using slony to get your data over as well..
--
Regards,
Hannes Dorbath
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-04-27 07:40:22 | Re: binary representation of date and numeric |
Previous Message | Felix Kater | 2007-04-27 07:22:47 | binary representation of date and numeric |