Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?
Date: 1998-08-17 14:17:33
Message-ID: 463.903363453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> There is someone working on a man page output from the sgml, and if that
> comes through then this is pretty much a moot point.

Right, that's the ultimate solution for not having to maintain two sets
of doc files. I was kinda hoping that that would happen for 6.4,
actually. Any estimate how soon that will be possible?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-08-17 15:33:12 Re: [HACKERS] Rules: first fix on monday
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-08-17 13:46:29 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion)