From: | August Zajonc <augustz(at)augustz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Date: | 2007-04-23 20:16:14 |
Message-ID: | 462D140E.8010207@augustz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Between major
> improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to
> implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to
> more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
>
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?
>
> Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a
> warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some
> of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges.
>
> Of course, that does put is closer to 10.0 which is going to break a lot of
> packager's scripts. ;-)
>
> Thoughts?
I like 8.3 better personally.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-04-23 20:22:34 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-04-23 19:36:56 | Re: Jav Database Performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-04-23 20:22:34 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Previous Message | korryd | 2007-04-23 20:05:24 | Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYSE for pl/pgsql functions |