| From: | August Zajonc <augustz(at)augustz(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 20:16:14 |
| Message-ID: | 462D140E.8010207@augustz.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Between major
> improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to
> implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to
> more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
>
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?
>
> Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a
> warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some
> of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges.
>
> Of course, that does put is closer to 10.0 which is going to break a lot of
> packager's scripts. ;-)
>
> Thoughts?
I like 8.3 better personally.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-04-23 20:22:34 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-04-23 19:36:56 | Re: Jav Database Performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-04-23 20:22:34 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | korryd | 2007-04-23 20:05:24 | Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYSE for pl/pgsql functions |