| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Frits Jalvingh <jal(at)etc(dot)to> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: temp_file_limit? | 
| Date: | 2022-12-18 19:28:32 | 
| Message-ID: | 462805.1671391712@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
Frits Jalvingh <jal(at)etc(dot)to> writes:
> Just to be clear: my real question is: why is temp_file_limit not working
> at the specified size?
I've not looked at that code lately, but I strongly suspect that
it's implemented in such a way that it's a per-process limit, not a
per-session limit.  So each parallel worker could use up that much
space.
It's also possible that you've found an actual bug, but without
a reproducer case nobody's going to take that possibility too
seriously.  We're unlikely to accept "the limit should work
across multiple processes" as a valid bug though.  That would
require a vastly more complicated implementation.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-12-18 20:10:52 | Re: Fwd: temp_file_limit? | 
| Previous Message | Frits Jalvingh | 2022-12-18 17:29:41 | Fwd: temp_file_limit? |