Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Date: 2007-04-18 09:22:36
Message-ID: 4625E35C.2060708@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Craig A. James wrote:

> Since we're only aggregating information, we have
> no control over the data that these companies provide.

And at the end of the day that's the root of the problem. It's easy to
be lulled into "well it looks like a primary key" rather than being able
to guarantee it.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-04-18 12:19:55 Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys
Previous Message Craig A. James 2007-04-18 04:06:15 Re: Basic Q on superfluous primary keys