Re: Vista/IPv6

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vista/IPv6
Date: 2007-04-11 14:57:04
Message-ID: 461CF740.10200@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:08:36AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 15:36 schrieb Dave Page:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This means that the regression tests fail to run, leaving a
>>>>>> postmaster.log full of 'no pg_hba.conf entry for host ::1' errors.
>>>>>> Should we have initdb enable the ::1 pg_hba.conf trust entry by default
>>>>>> on Vista? Any better options?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The default installation has that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ... as long as it's present and turned on on the build machine.
>>>>
>>> Let me pre-emt the discussion by saying that the msvc build does not detect
>>> ipv6 on the build machine (yet). Are you building with msvc or mingw on
>>> this machine?
>>>
>> msvc. Grrr.
>>
>> Eta to fix?
>>
>
> Eh. None, so far :-)
> Point being - if you build on a ipv6 enabled machine, will that binary then
> work at all on a non-ipv6 machine? Consider binaries distributed by the
> installer... Might as well think up the proper fix before we just band-aid
> it for the regression tests..
>
>

Yes, it should.

This was all tested back when we fixed Windows ipv6, around 8.1
timeframe. Look at the source of initdb and you'll see how it works.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-04-11 14:57:36 Re: Vista/IPv6
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-04-11 14:46:29 Re: Vista/IPv6