Re: Fate of pgsnmpd

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-07 21:29:13
Message-ID: 46180D29.101@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 06:01:10AM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
>> Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot
>> easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first.
>> Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't
>> cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want
>> to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific
>> MIB..
>
> I might be interested in contributing to this effort, if not with
> code then at least with discussion and testing. I'm currently using
> MRTG to execute Perl scripts that query the statistics views and
> I've been thinking about rewriting those scripts to be AgentX
> subagents so they'd be queryable via SNMP.
>

We're definitely interested in listening :-) Please join us over at the
pgsnmpd list.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-04-07 21:53:55 Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-04-07 18:29:38 Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?