From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kyle VanderBeek <kylev(at)yaga(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk |
Subject: | Re: Re: JDBC int8 hack |
Date: | 2001-04-13 16:51:59 |
Message-ID: | 4617.987180719@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Kyle VanderBeek <kylev(at)yaga(dot)com> writes:
> Please consider applying my patch to the 7.0 codebase as a stop-gap
> measure until such time as the optimizer can be improved to notice
> indecies on INT8 columns and cast INT arguments up.
I think it's an extremely bad idea to hack up JDBC to get around a
backend shortcoming. The hack will persist and cause problems long
after the real issue has been fixed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-13 17:22:38 | Re: Maybe a plpgsql bug? |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2001-04-13 16:48:51 | Re: Call for platforms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-04-14 19:12:02 | pgmonitor query global variable |
Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2001-04-13 16:48:51 | Re: Call for platforms |