| From: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Milen A(dot) Radev" <milen(at)radev(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backup of a big DB with a lot of large objects |
| Date: | 2006-12-01 18:06:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4617.40027.qm@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> > Replicate it???
>
> I'm hesitant about replacing backup with replication. It seems to me
> like trying to shoot a mosquito with a cannon.
One some threads that I've read, some posters mention that once their databases reach a certain
size threshold, backups times become so large that replication seems to be the better perhaps only
choice.
I suppose that if replication is used, one of their child read-only servers can be dedicated the
task of backing up the database thereby relieving that load off of the parent read/write server.
But this doesn't solve the problem increasing back-up times. Of course, equipping yourself with a
cannon now will really help after your mosquito grows in to an albatross. :o)
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kim | 2006-12-01 18:14:04 | Create table/view/index hanging following server crash |
| Previous Message | Antonios Katsikadamos | 2006-12-01 17:34:34 | producing documentation from postgres file |