Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 23:24:37
Message-ID: 4616D6B5.7080504@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ron wrote:
> I read them as soon as they were available. Then I shrugged and noted
> YMMV to myself.
>
>
> 1= Those studies are valid for =those= users under =those= users'
> circumstances in =those= users' environments.
> How well do those circumstances and environments mimic anyone else's?

Exactly, understanding whether the studies are applicable to you is the
critical step - before acting on their conclusions! Thanks Ron, for the
thoughtful analysis on this topic!

Cheers

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-07 02:35:44 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message Andreas Kostyrka 2007-04-06 23:17:55 Re: SCSI vs SATA