From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checkpoint gets stuck in mdsync |
Date: | 2007-04-05 09:35:33 |
Message-ID: | 4614C2E5.1030304@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Now that the CheckpointStartLock starvation has been taken care of, I'm
>> seeing another problem with checkpoints in my test run: mdsync never
>> finishes.
>>
>> My proposed fix is to make a copy of pendingOpsTable before entering the
>> loop. AbsorbFsyncRequest will put new requests to a fresh new
>> pendingOpsTable, while the mdsync loop will drain the copy. I'll write a
>> patch along those lines if there's no better ideas.
>
> Yeah, I'm also anxious about the stuck. I wrote a fix to use a copy of
> pendingOpsTable as you said, when I implemented Load distributed checkpoint
> patch. (http://momjian.us/mhonarc/patches/msg00025.html) It would make me
> very happy if you review my patch and check whether my fix is proper.
>
> There was another reason to fix it in my patch. I wanted to fsync files
> only once for each file because bgwriter sleeps for each file in my patch.
Ah, I see. I looked at the patch briefly a few days ago, and wondered
why there was so many changes to mdsync. I didn't realize there was a
fix to the "getting stuck" problem in there as well.
I'll take a closer look, and try to write a patch to just fix the
"getting stuck" problem, but in a way that anticipates the load
distributed checkpoint patch so that it doesn't need to be rewritten again.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2007-04-05 09:52:14 | Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-05 09:34:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |