| From: | "John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Lincoln Yeoh" <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
| Cc: | "John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound error |
| Date: | 2005-10-31 17:27:15 |
| Message-ID: | 46110.195.152.219.3.1130779635.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Lincoln Yeoh said:
> At 07:48 PM 10/30/2005 +0000, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
>
>>"Panic" - that's my middle name. ;)
>>
>>Had I known how to identify the database at fault, and that it would have
>>had no effect on the other databases, then I would have handled this
>>episode differently.
>
> Wonder if it would be a good idea for the error messages to identify which
> databases might have lost data.
>
> However if you have a fair number of databases involved you might get a
> fair number of log messages. Still, I think I wouldn't mind 100 lines in
> the logs if I had 100 databases at risk...
>
Agreed!
John
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard_D_Levine | 2005-10-31 17:27:17 | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
| Previous Message | Marcel Thibault | 2005-10-31 17:21:18 | Table Qualifiers in Update Statement |