From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum |
Date: | 2007-03-27 17:26:38 |
Message-ID: | 460953CE.6010504@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe we should keep this issue open until we resolve the vacuum WAL
>> flush issue? I can then rerun the same tests to see if this patch is a
>> win after that.
>
> Sounds like a plan, if you are willing to do that.
Sure, just rerunning the same tests isn't much work.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Would you like to add a TODO item?
I don't know how we track things like this. Maybe add to the end of the
patch queue, with link to this discussion so that we remember that it
needs more testing?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 17:27:42 | Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_get_domaindef |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-27 17:19:25 | Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum |