From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance of count(*) |
Date: | 2007-03-23 16:54:05 |
Message-ID: | 4604062D.3000905@wildenhain.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Michael Stone schrieb:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 01:01:02PM +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>> This discussion is a bit theoretical until we see the actual problem
>> and the proposed solution here.
>
> It's good to see you back off a bit from your previous stance of
> assuming that someone doesn't know what they're doing and that their
> solution is absolutely wrong without actually knowing anything about
> what they are trying to do.
Well I'm sure its very likely wrong :-) At least the core part of
it with the statement of "keeping index data outside postgres".
What I meant with my comment about the theoreticalness: we cannot
make educated suggestions about alternative solutions to the problem
until we know the problem and maybe the current solution in detail.
Regards
Tino
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-03-23 17:01:40 | EXISTS optimization |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-03-23 16:32:35 | Re: Vacuum full is slow |