Re: linux - server configuration for small database

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Paolo Negri <hungrylist(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: linux - server configuration for small database
Date: 2007-03-23 15:51:25
Message-ID: 4603F77D.1050705@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Paolo Negri" <hungrylist(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The first question I have is, since I'd strongly prefer to use
>> postgresql 8.1 or 8.2 instead of the 7.4 that comes with redhat, if
>> someone else is using with success third party rpms with success in
>> business critical applications.
>
> Red Hat does support postgres 8.1 on RHEL4:
> http://www.redhat.com/appstack/

And so does the community:

http://ftp9.us.postgresql.org/pub/mirrors/postgresql/binary/v8.1.8/linux/rpms/redhat/
http://ftp9.us.postgresql.org/pub/mirrors/postgresql/binary/v8.2.3/linux/rpms/redhat/

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-03-23 16:32:35 Re: Vacuum full is slow
Previous Message Dimitri 2007-03-23 15:37:32 Re: Parallel Vacuum