| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback |
| Date: | 2007-03-20 23:03:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4600683C.50106@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Hackers et al... I was wondering if there are any outstanding issues
>> that need to be resolved in terms of the clustered index/bitmap changes?
>>
>> >From the testing that I have done, plus a couple of others it is a net
>> win (at least from DBA space).
>
> Not sure if you're talking about bitmap indexes here. If so, I'm working
> on VACUUM support.
I was talking about the patch for Clustered indexes and I realize now I
might have used the wrong thread. ;
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Gavin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-21 00:03:05 | Re: Fixing hash index build time |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-03-20 23:00:52 | Re: Make TIMESTAMP + TIME in the source code |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-03-21 05:41:07 | HOT WIP Patch - Version 5.0 |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-03-20 22:36:55 | Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback |