Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback
Date: 2007-03-20 18:45:49
Message-ID: 46002BDD.6030603@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hackers et al... I was wondering if there are any outstanding issues
that need to be resolved in terms of the clustered index/bitmap changes?

From the testing that I have done, plus a couple of others it is a net
win (at least from DBA space).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-03-20 18:46:01 Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-03-20 18:38:36 Re: Indexam interface proposal

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-03-20 21:19:05 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-03-20 18:20:45 Make CLUSTER MVCC-safe