| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Let people set host(no)ssl settings from initdb |
| Date: | 2021-03-08 23:13:14 |
| Message-ID: | 45a36b35-7f80-e112-026d-6a82cc4fe207@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/8/21 11:23 AM, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:25 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
> <mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:07:30PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I think there is enough sustained opposition to this patch that
> we can mark
> > this as rejected in the commitfest.
>
> +1.
> --
> Michael
>
>
> The patch
> (v5-0001-Enable-setting-pg_hba.conf-permissions-from-initd.patch) does
> not apply successfully.
> There are two reasons first is it was not generated with proper "-p"
> which confused cfbot. Second, after
> fixing that issue you still need to rebase that.
>
>
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2916.log
> <http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2916.log>
>
> |+++ doc/src/sgml/ref/initdb.sgml
> --------------------------
> No file to patch. Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
> can't find file to patch at input line 77
> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
>
>
> Can we get a rebase?
>
> I am marking the patch "Waiting on Author"
What is the point of doing that if we're going to reject the patch as
discussed upthread?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-03-08 23:14:19 | Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update |
| Previous Message | 'Alvaro Herrera' | 2021-03-08 23:02:39 | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |