Re: bgwriter stats

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PGSQL-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bgwriter stats
Date: 2007-03-20 02:48:00
Message-ID: 45FF4B60.7000304@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> This seems quite a bizarre way to do things. Why wouldn't you implement
> this functionality by shipping messages to the stats collector?
>

Would that have any benefits over the shmem approach?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-20 03:00:51 Re: bgwriter stats
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-20 01:46:31 Re: Win32 shmem