Re: modifying the tbale function

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Actually, I think we could teach the PLs to do it - just not
> transparently, so we'd need to mark which functions used the new
> protocol. Such functions would get a state object as an implied first
> argument, so in plperl it might work like this (for a
> generate_series-like function):

> To support this I think we'd need to do something like:
>
> create function mygs(int, int)
> returns setof int
> language plperl
> with srfstate
> as $$ ... $$;

Is this not what we do with aggregate functions at present?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd