Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Date: 2007-03-19 00:35:05
Message-ID: 45FDDAB9.6060009@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>> Below is a list of the input routines in the adt directory, courtesy of grep.
>>
>
> Grep isn't a good way to get these, your list missed a bunch.
>
> postgres=# select distinct prosrc from pg_proc where oid in (select typinput from pg_type);
>
>
[snip]
> (64 rows)
>
>

Ok, good point. Now, which of those need to have a check for valid encoding?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-19 03:22:13 Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-03-18 23:33:21 Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?