Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, CAJ CAJ <pguser(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases
Date: 2007-03-15 16:05:00
Message-ID: 45F96EAC.3010808@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> I also tend to run every other version. I've run 7.2, then 7.4, then
> 8.1. I've tested and played with 8.2 and speed wise, it wasn't a
> compelling enough upgrade to start the very long process of replacing
> 8.1 with. By the time 8.3 comes out, I'll be about ready to start
> evaluating our next version of pgsql.
>
> I have to say the update to 8.1 was very compelling, as the query
> optimizer was much better, and the ability to use indexes on date
> columns with references like now() - interval '5 days' was a huge thing
> for my reporting apps.

Yeah 8.1 was a great milestone, being able to allocate more
shared_buffers has been a great boon for many of our customers that are
running 4+ GIG of ram.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2007-03-15 16:09:37 Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-15 15:55:25 Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion