From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: UPDATE using sub selects |
Date: | 2007-03-15 14:47:20 |
Message-ID: | 45F95C78.1040307@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NikhilS wrote:
> I have tried some update-subselect variations and they seem to work. For
> example the case in the src/test/regress/sql/update.sql, which used to
> fail till now, seems to work:
>
> UPDATE update_test SET (a,b) = (select a,b FROM update_test where c =
> 'foo')
> WHERE a = 10;
What's the expected result if the tuple from subselect is more than 1?
I expect no update at all in case of void result set, is this the case ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF+Vx47UpzwH2SGd4RAvyVAKCGK5pC9B/lmrNjAFPGXhm5ialwSwCglM2n
DxrxWyvJASX5WSF9B8cAMas=
=AoVF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2007-03-15 14:52:47 | Re: Backend crash in 8.2.3 with plpgsql function |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-03-15 14:45:43 | Re: Additional global stats for pg_database? |