| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
| Date: | 2007-03-15 09:53:32 |
| Message-ID: | 45F9179C.4040604@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Which is why we don't do things that way. The code must fit within the
> general architecture before application -- particularly if it's an
> internal API change. That's what the review process is for.
Yes, of course. As I've said, I have the time to work on this, but I
need get the review process *started*. Otherwise I'll just tweak and
polish the patch for weeks, and end up with something that gets rejected
in the end anyway.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2007-03-15 10:23:34 | where to add/change commands |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-03-15 09:47:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-03-15 10:38:26 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-03-15 09:47:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |