Re: CLUSTER and MVCC

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
Date: 2007-03-13 09:18:50
Message-ID: 45F66C7A.6070608@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> In each chain, there must be at least one non-dead tuple with xmin <
>> Oldestxmin.
>
> Huh? Typically *all* the tuples but the last are dead, for varying
> values of "dead". Please be more specific what you mean.

I meant dead as in HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum(...) == HEAPTUPLE_DEAD.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2007-03-13 09:27:36 Re: My honours project - databases using dynamically attached entity-properties
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-03-13 09:14:06 Re: czech national site is moved