From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Schwarz, Karl" <Karl(dot)Schwarz(at)ngc(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: function performance vs in-line sql |
Date: | 2007-03-08 17:52:34 |
Message-ID: | 45F04D62.8090302@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Schwarz, Karl wrote:
> I am having a performance problem with a query implemented within a
> server side function. If I use an SQL client(EMS Postgres) and manually
> generate the sql query I get about 100 times performance improvement
> over using the function.
>
> I've also tried using a prepared statement from my application and
> observed a similar performance improvement over the the function.
>
> The table I am quering against has several hundred thousand records. I
> have indexes defined and I've run vacuum several times.
>
> Is there something basic I am missing here with the use of a function. I
> am no database expert, but my assumption was that a function would give
> me better results than in-line sql.
>
> I've seen a mailing list entry in another list that implied that the
> query planner for a function behaves differently than in-line sql.
For starters, can you show us the function, the manual sql query and the
schema, please?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig A. James | 2007-03-08 18:34:06 | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-03-08 17:49:41 | Re: function performance vs in-line sql |